Bakiyev Americans

Indeed, for these purposes, Americans and Co. went into Afghanistan and there organized the production of heroin. During the period that the contingent of NATO is in Afghanistan (ie, over the past eight years), the production of opiates in this country increased by 44 times! In this situation, Kyrgyz clans traditionally controlled drug trafficking, and forced to be content with little, which is understandable – they are unlikely to suit. Rather, these clans and "lobbied" Bakiyev. What happened next we all know.

Once we have identified the main motive of the April coup, will return to Rosa Otunbayeva. As you might expect, it being the head of the interim Kyrgyz government, immediately after the coup, the U.S. government to guarantee the renewal of the lease of military bases "Manas", which later may assume influenced her appointment by the President of the Kyrgyz Republic in transition as the most-managed policy. But the Americans would not be Americans, if not squeezed out all situations. And I think, further riots and massacres in Osh and Dzhadal-Abad, were triggered with one aim – to force Russia to introduce a peacekeeping contingent in Kyrgyzstan, which is immediately after the riots Otunbayeva asked the Russian leadership. The Americans controlled the mouth of the western media in this case supported, justifying the need for Russian troops to the republic that Russia has an idea power structures of the Asian republics and features Kyrgyz mentality, but because de only it can successfully resolve the conflict. And to ward off suspicion by the Americans in controlled entities Kyrgyz "elite" all the blame dumped on Bakiyev and his relatives – those allegedly decided to take this step, wanting to avenge the coup. It may be that this is so.