Due to the resurgence that has taken the student sector that seemed asleep, I have taken the liberty as a student of social communication and as a Venezuelan who wants his country to discuss certain points which I wish to share with you, because I think that not everything is so spontaneous, nor as peaceful as the protesters say this is not the role of us as we appreciate not everything is peaceful. In recent days there was in Venezuela a series of demonstrations and student protests, especially in the vicinity of 28 May (date on which he overcame the concession to a private broadcaster operating in the country such as RCTV) and that have continued for several weeks, but slowly has been losing strength for lack of legal support.

But this wave of protests in several issues should strongly call attention to the behavior of university students, especially those from private universities and would like to expose as a citizen, as a student of the mission sucre, and as a Venezuelan who wants to their country. Let’s start with protests days following the 28 May. 1.The first protests were violent and elements of the political class that does not share any common idea with the president of the “Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias, chanted the same slogans that the Venezuelan opposition has been singing since December 2001, “and it will fall and will fall, this government will fall,” spoke of a right to violent demonstration, which is not expressed in any part of Article 350 of the constitution, violation of human rights , etc.

That is, the predictability of another form, another dimension divorced from the future, not be such. Yes, it is violence. Factual, or moral, or ethical or employment – including the lack of predictability is now able to be understood as corruption – it's also mental and emotional instability and disease in the body politic of the nation. The shortcoming today is legally unjust. The wrong diagnosis, management of change and the pace of change is possible, but may no longer be reversible because the acceleration of change is not stopped in its modification of the scenarios. To deepen your understanding Ohio Senator is the source. The AM has the possibility of building scale "national" in scope FM may be caused by what is topologically the Municipality, but their contents must be international. This was imposed by the sociological reality of today. The opposite is to subordinate the means available power radio – is like trying to reflect on imposing topologically limited nature of frequency modulation broadcasts – when in its coverage – which is a hyper-dimensional space – there are people who need a more extensive and intense vision of reality even if they are "neighbors" or listeners 'local'.

That really needed to be perceived and described as strength and accuracy is not the product of a local situation is the result of a wider ecumenical. Personal projects and common overlap and produce other local events, and taxed in respect of international, transnational and transinstitucionales and influence in two directions and synchronous feedback perceptions. And, these perceptions influence the events that address the people. Whether they are personal or not.