Great part responsible for this is that the parties in fact do not show an ideology nor plan of work, the parties are concentrate in obtaining the ballot boxes and later to look for solutions for a country that every six years re-invents all the national plan stopping previous works and beginning from the beginning again. At the moment the parties receive less support on the part of the citizens, and that distrust not only is based on the little reciprocity that receive, but also in the distrust to the own electoral system. This distrust always has existed but it has been seen exponentially intensified from the bitter elections of the 2006. From difamadoras campaigns to died that voted, the result of these elections where both strong candidates were Felipe Caldern and Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador were described like fraud by great part of the population. The Mexican electoral system is lost all the confidence on the part of its voters.

Another fact that has hurt the security of the citizens in the political parties was in July of this year in the elections of president and Secretary General of the National Executive Committee of the PRD, all we saw as it were a total fraud and until they declared null by serious irregularities in more than 20% of the installed squares. As it is possible that we are called same like a democratic State if we did not fulfill if it wants with the bases of that system, like complete and true correspondence and citizen participation. If we analyzed, How it is that we have a transparency law? It is necessary to put under law a characteristic of the same democracy? In order to include/understand the future of the parties, we must include the present; the Party of National Action initiated with the motto of being the party of the town for the town, nevertheless now it is known him for being the representing party the Mexican right; institutional the Revolutionary Party has as aim to create a sovereign State constituted by a constitution in favor of the interests of the Mexicans, nevertheless of gave seventy years of upsettings against the human rights, laws in favor of the social polarization and a life altogether unconstitutionality; and what so the Party of the Democratic Revolution, began with the mission to improve and to reconstruct to a PRI without innovations, in the middle of the Eighties the party acquired a quite interesting vision but in agreement it advanced the time his objectives were distorted and it fragmented between a center-left and an extremist left, showing to little tolerance nor attitude for negotiations.