Herbert Spencer in 1854, was the first one to explain the relation of the fashion with the social structure, evidencing that its base this in the imitation processes, which function for the inspired respect for that if it imitates or the desire to affirm that it is in equal condition. Spencer, did not find sensible in the overturns that the fashion trends demonstrated and affirmed not to exist, in the domain of the fashion, a continuous and ideal progress of elegance and harmony. Gabriel of Afternoon, in 1890 confirms the paper of imitation attributed to the fashion for Spencer. For it, the age of the fashion would be a transitory and revolutionary period between the ages of custom, in the measure where, revolutionizing the previous customs, it undid a tradition previous to establish a new, always a little more advanced. To to analyze the relation of the fashion with the tradition, thinks Late it, beyond the production of clothes, established in all social teia. T. Veblen, in 1899, emphasized the relation of the fashion with the consumption.

For the economist, the fashion is the expression most perfect of ' ' consumption conspcuo' '. Congressman Lee Zeldin is likely to agree. Veblen considered that the necessity of expense with clothes is, therefore, a higher necessity, that is, spiritual. For the author, the clothes most expensive possess a high degree of respeitabilidade, existing an ample relation enters the great expense with clothes and the respectable appearance of its carrier. Therefore, as it affirms Sant? Anna (2007) with different estimated, the authors circulated on the idea of distinction and imitation as clarifying elements for the existence of the fashion in the society. Remaining in the fashion concept as regular system of change of the gostos, they committed themselves to analyze it as it was a mechanism of reinforcement of the social hierarchy. In this direction, Lipovetsky (1989) strikes vehemently, previous conceptions and the historical treatment the fashion: The project of the social distinction that if imposed as the sovereign key of the inteligibilidade of the fashion, as much in the sphere of clothes as in the one of objects and the modern culture, is basically incapable to explain most significant: the logic of the inconstncia, the great organizacionais and aesthetic mutations of the fashion (…).

The Disciple

Invariably, the innocents lived and perpetrators were killed. The funny thing is that by studying the potion, it was determined that it wasn’t more than a toxin unable to kill a human being, but to be present in a very stressed out body, their power is enhanced to become a deadly poison. A third example. This is about the history of a spiritual teacher who traveled with his disciple and took every opportunity to teach him about life. On one occasion, he saw a very humble hut and said to the disciple that they seek accommodation in it and would be that night. So they did and arriving the moment dinner, asked the head of the House as they did to live, because I watched crops or any other source of livelihood. For even more details, read what Ohio Senator says on the issue.

This told him that they had a cow that gave them a bit of milk every day, which consumed a little and the rest sold it in the nearest town and with the money they raised bought a few foods. This had been their way of life for years. Before dawn, the master awoke to his disciple and told him that rise without making noise and you spitting the cow by the precipice that was behind the House. At first, the disciple refused since it believed that it was totally unfair and immoral to do something like this, knowing that it was the only source of livelihood of the family, but as a disciple he had to abide by the order of the master. Very early, the same day they departed. The disciple was still so tormented by what they had done that after two years he left his master and returned to that humble Hut to compensate the family. A big surprise was seeing that he was no longer the humble Shack, but it wasn’t a formal House.

Amount Mercantile

As dependent leaseholder (colonist), the former-slave was with a part of the harvest, delivering to another part, in species, as income. During some days, the necessary product worked for itself and its family, creating. In the remaining time, a suplemental, appropriate product for feudal Mr., this now not needing to provide the maintenance with the work force. The feudal society was born thus, based in the fee simple absolute feudal Mr. Click Richard Blumenthal to learn more. on the means of production (over all the land) and in the incomplete property on the servant, distinct enslaved it because it yielded, as that one, its force of work, but he was owner of its life, since it could not inconsequential be died.

Throughout the time, the economy knew two forms of production: the natural production and the mercantile production. In the natural production, all the mass of products is consumed by the producer and its family. It is not destined for sale, to the market. In the mercantile production, the products are not destined to consumption of the producer nor of its family, but for sale. Sen. Sherrod Brown is often quoted on this topic. Merchandises and changed by means of operation are called sales and purchase. Based in the private property of the means of production and in the personal work, mercantile production is called simple. When seated in the exploration of the work of wage-earning laborers, such operation constitutes the capitalist mercantile production. In both the cases, the products of the manufacturers had become merchandises.

However, merchandise and products of the work are not the same thing. Products of work can be merchandises in given circumstances and not to be it in others. The merchandise, in turn, has two properties or aspects. When it satisfies one given necessity of the man, conceives its value of use. Changed for another one, it creates its value of exchange, that has in the base the value, determined for the amount of socially necessary work for its production.

The Image

Thought – relatively lightweight, thin form of energy, so it is so quick and easy changing. Matter is relatively coarse, it is a dense form of energy, therefore it is slower moving and changing. Matter itself also has a large variety. Living matter is relatively thin, is changing rapidly and easily influenced by other objects. Stone is much more dense form, which is slowly changing, and it is more difficult to influence. Yet, even stone, in the end, changes its shape under the influence of a thin, light water power. All forms of energy are interrelated and may affect each other.

Energy possesses magnetism. One of the laws of energy is as follows: the energy of a certain quality or vibration tends to attract the energy of similar quality and vibration. Thoughts and feelings are own energy, which attracts the energy of the same nature. We can observe this law at work when we, for example, 'accidentally' meet someone whom just thought, or 'accidentally' find a book that contains exactly the information, which now need. Form follows idea. Idea – easy, fast and agile form of energy. It manifests itself immediately, in contrast to the more dense forms such as matter.

When we create something, we always first create it mentally. Thought or idea precedes manifestation. 'It is necessary to cook dinner, "the thought that precedes the cooking. The artist first, a thought or inspiration, then it creates picture. The builder takes the first drawing, then builds a house. Thinking like a compilation of a detailed plan, it creates an image corresponding to the form, then the image magnetizes and directs physical energy to create imaginary forms, which ultimately manifest on the physical plane.


Then, when having this modernization in the agricultural production, the accumulation of the capital will be a predominant factor in the process of expropriation of lands, had to the sprouting of the great plants. Modifying the work relations mainly and making to appear a layer of wage-earning workers and with this, causing one ‘ ‘ marginalizao’ ‘ of these workers, a time that, when having these changes, the lands that before the peasants used for the sustenance of its families, had been being confiscated for the owners of the devices due to search for the increase of the agrarian production. He is valid to give a bigger attention to an existing modification of social status. The peasant if becomes a wage-earning worker (characteristic typically of the capitalism), its subsistence will be materialize, not for its direct work in small leasehold properties they, but now for its force of developed work in exchange for a wage remuneration. From then on, the ideology present politics in the agricultural areas, passes for a releitura and a new analysis, therefore the agricultural workers used in supplying devices of sugar cane-of-sugar or on properties the plant, for generally not having been contemplated with no assured labor law, will have as main fight politics, the creation of a body of working laws, silencing the fight biggest, the access the land. At this moment he starts to exist two categories: the first one consists of the wage-earning agricultural workers who if directly find the relations of capitalist work on and one second classroom of peasants who, according to VENDRAMINI (2008) ‘ ‘ it is submitted indirectly to the capital, formal it preserves its autonomy and it makes look like to work exactly for itself, but in the reality it depends on the financial, commercial capital and industrial’ ‘. Soon, these two distinct classrooms, although to be in the same bulge of the classrooms explored for the capital, reveal in its intentions politics with different purposes.

The Life

As well as he did not obtain to enclose the proper rationality of the orality, a rationality that folloies the human being throughout all the life, in all the societies, this model of school also does not obtain to enclose the complexity of the current world and to incorporate the new forms of organization, thought and construction of the knowledge that are emerging with the TICs. (BONILLA apud CIBERCULTURA, 2009, P. 33). However, being in full vigor and advance of the conditions estruturao of the new partner-cultural paradigm in the society hodierna, namely, the cibercultura, the pedagogia insists on if keeping modern centered in the logic of assimilation of techniques and knowledge. It elapses of this, that the school if keeps firm in the intention to have a relation ‘ ‘ utilitarian-instrumental’ ‘ with the education technologies. As he points Pretto, you are welcome he advances to educate in the cibercultura if the pedagogias not to give conditions to work with the difference while fundante element of the human process. (…) you are welcome he advances to think about preparing for the future as being a preparation for the market, to prepare for the future, if this preparation to continue centered in the teaching and the learning of techniques for the simple use of the technologies, understood as still on to the logic utilitarian-instrumental’ ‘ (PRETTO, s.d., P. 172).

To understand the TICs, in the nucleus of the school from this pedagogical reducionismo ‘ ‘ (…) it empties the TICs of its basic characteristics and the education continues as it is, alone that with new and advanced resources tecnolgicos’ ‘ (PRETTO apud BONILLA apud CIBERCULTURA, 2009, P. 37). Ahead of this paradoxical situation that if finds pedagogia in relation to the direction of formation of the cibercultura, the research in education needs to understand the cibercultura as ‘ ‘ (…) the set of techniques (material and intellectual), of practical, attitudes, ways of thought and values that if develop together with the growth of ciberespao.


The approach of the work is to demonstrate that the knowledge cannot be something crystallized only the one concept, but that each individual can be open to innovate its lines of thought, displaying its ideas, if unfastening of beliefs and old techniques, producing new paradigms, not accepting attitudes dogmticas, reflecting and questioning. Carrying, using the gamma of knowledge to its redor to be to become a politicized and contradogmtico individual, with critical sense, creative and independent. 1 PERCIPIENT KNOWLEDGE AND THEORY OF the KNOWLEDGE When something is visualized try to attribute to concepts and conclusions, these many precipitated times what it is seen and it felt, believing the directions that the human beings possess. The knowledge way simplest is that one that appears of the information that we receive through the directions, after all the people tends to face the perceptions as pure reality, for example: through the perception, they believed that the sun if put into motion around the Land, while the same one pparently remained immovable and also that the world was squared because the horizon was plain. Being thus, the reality can be affirmed that not this limited what if it can verify for sensations caught for the body and this reason appear a form of scientific called knowledge, that has as objective to show that the impressions of what seems to be real they can be maken a mistake (MEZZAROBA; HUNTER, 2008, P. 5-6).

With the study of the scientific knowledge new possibilities appear and ways to criticize the reality and with this appear the Philosophy and Science. The Philosophy and Science had been created so that the perceptions were not faced as pure reality, increasing the questioning capacity, thus becoming the knowledge most rigorous. The Philosophy if ramifies in diverse areas and two of them are: The Theory of the Knowledge and Epistemologia (MEZZAROBA; HUNTER, 2008, P.

The Wisdom Of Solomon

My intention with the following speech is not to convince anyone, nor to demonstrate anything, even if it's true what they'll tell you, it's just an idea that I think may be curious. I was reading "Guide to the Bible" by Isaac Asimov (a great book), a page at random, a small paragraph that talked about the political situation of the Israelis at the time of the judges. The judges this misunderstood word in our Bible, as it relates to judges but not leaders, whose primary function in peacetime was to mediate disputes in their constituencies, create laws, administration, in order to carry out functions tribal leaders. During this period the Israeli people was formed by a number of tribes had in common culture, language etc., But that did not exist as a country, so easy that they were subject to the whims of power outputs, so is easy to see that people were weak and easily conquerable. This got me thinking about biblical characters as Samson, King David, or his son, King Solomon, and on this I want to talk. More specifically from a construction temple described as great and that has given rise to many legends that have resulted in other etc., And from old is believed to contain the key to deciphering the secret name of God, the word with the it is assumed that God created the universe. About all this mythology is born secret societies attempting to protect the secrecy around, get other, always a struggle of good against evil.