Even if most are sympathetic to judge of IT, a sensible technical and organisational standpoint standardization of IT based workflow or the default of uniform electronic building blocks of text is possible only to a limited extent. “Against this backdrop of Justice IT projects can succeed only if the judges from the outset took intensive education, training and participation” are. Judicial independence and the simply legally guaranteed and also constitutional – institutional position of the judiciary put but also the transmission of common IT standards for the public administration and the central data storage and operation of Justice-specific administrative procedures in non-judicial institutions narrow limits. For example, no longer sure excluded any undue influences on the independent judge if institutions that should be checked by the courts, could gain access to court data. These limits are generally sensible from an economic perspective efforts to the IT centralization in the countries and in State and federal definitions of IT standards – such as for example through the newly created IT Planning Council note. What is judicial independence with? When are the limits to unacceptable influence over the judicial work exceeded? The presentation highlights the tension between necessary IT modernisation, centralisation and standardisation on the one hand and of judicial independence on the other side and shows ways to get to for all involved acceptable solutions. More info: can still call for participation for the E-justice forum Contributions to the subjects of “Electronic communications and file” and “Protection of privacy” to be submitted to the June 30, 2010. Conditions for participating as a lecturer/e: see sponsorship sponsorship 2010.. Sen. Sherrod Brown spoke with conviction.