In Russia more and more strange things began to fall, from which may be affected population of humanity. What drugs are sold legally under the guise of aromatic compounds, from which people are dying to be more popular among young people, they most obezbashennye in smoking these blends, usually they die, because I do not know the steps, and the government that is in no hurry to act like that. A sort of gaming machines banned and took them to a special place, but yesterday Avtozavodskoi district of Novgorod, especially not straining already been in two clubs. Rules there is almost unchanged, except that the money you are now in the machine Do not push, and to buy voucher for a hundred rubles, then give it to the girl, which is easily manipulated hand puts you on a loan these same one hundred rubles. And another strange thing that just kills me, and it is associated with the swine flu, do not understand those people who, knowing that the abroad to roam the disease, still go there to relax, and then ill come home and begin to spread this infection. You ask what connection there? I'll explain it all from perishing mankind! ps People who operate the brain and make meaningful deeds!
In other words, knowing where to go, help them know where to go, and then get to a strategy of both to get there. In terms of negotiation, to call this a win-win solution. Obviously, this strategy can work only if the value of the student, and you think he or she can do a better teacher. For example, during my first three years in education, I quickly realized that what he wanted and what students think they needed were diametrically opposed to each other. However, after many conversations with former students, I soon discovered that students were not so concerned with the merits of a case as they were with the way the matter was being taught. They were more concerned with my attitude would give them the answers. This was a revelation.
I concluded that as a parent, my experience and education that was given qualified to teach what they need to succeed. However, when it was the way they received the information, I was totally at their mercy. Because, no matter how good or important the issue is, if nobody is listening, then no one is learning. It was at that time decided to “go where they were” to bring them to where I was. Individually and collectively met with students to obtain their views on class. I asked them about what worked in class and what not? I asked them about what they would like to see more or less? What would you like to see changed (about myself and / or class)? I asked whether or not recommend this class to another student, why or why not? I asked them what would make the class more productive and more interesting? These questions can be posed in almost any work environment, for almost every department, not only in the classroom.
I asked similar questions of my clients when I was in Corporate America. , All the information I received, with the exception of individual meetings were conducted anonymously. I can not begin to tell you how important this information has been in my career. But in less than a year after the implementation of this idea, which was nominated twice for the distinguished teaching award at my school (the youngest nominee). If you want to become a teacher more productive in or out of classroom is the key contribution of the students? must be sought. They say the definition of insanity is doing the same things over and over again but expecting different results. If you listen and get feedback from your students, you will not have to repeat the mistakes of the past. For students of its value and contribution, trust me, they hold the keys to its success. Dr. Joe Martin is an award winning speaker, writer, teacher and educational consultant and owner of a new teacher success. Visit today!
This type, the Gouveia, judged that there for having been born in Lisbon it obtained to escape. It telephoned to the consul of Portugal, gentleman consul, I am Portuguese, I am hidden in such part, it comes to save me please, and already now my woman, who is black but she waits a son mine. Ah! Ah! It knows what it made the Portuguese consul? It was to search them it the two and to follow it delivered them in my hands. Ah! Ah! I was thankful to it very the consul, said to it, the comrade is a genuine revolutionary, I gave one to it I hug fort, even so enojado, is clearly, do not think that I do not have escrpulos, preferred to have to it cuspido in the face, but I gave one to it I hug, yes, I fired me of it and later I was to interrogate rapariga. It supported two days. To as much she give birth there exactly, one menininha, thus, of this size, blood, blood, when I think about this what I see is blood. … Blood, ppilas! , blood pra caralho, rapariga, to such of the Marta, with two eyes that seemed moons, costs to dream me it, and the baby to the shouts I smell, it to the burnt meat.
Still today, when I lie down and adormeo, I feel that one I smell of the child – One keeps silent! (AGUALUSA, 2006, P. the 176-177) souvenir is the survival of the past. The past, conserving itself in the spirit of each human being arises to the conscience in the form of image-souvenirs, kept for the individual memory reconstituted by the collective canary, for the collective memory. Ricoeur (2008) inquires concerning the esquecimento, if it is possible or to be happy not affirming that the malaise how much to the joust attitude that if must adopt before the uses and abuses of the esquecimento, mainly in practical the institucional one, it is finally a symptom of a tenacious uncertainty that affects the relation of the esquecimento with the pardon in the plan of its deep structure.
In this context, as Negri and Lazzarato already had salient, the uninterrupted production of information, knowledge, ideas, images, relationships and affection, substantially modify the scene of the work, that if becomes each more incorporeal time. Of this form, the transformations happened with the situation after-fordista and postindustrial, duly are illustrated by the concept of Incorporeal Work. In the incorporeal work what he is involved it is the production of new subjetividades in the society. Thus being, it is biopoltico because he looks the creation of forms of social life, if not limiting to the economic sphere, but if expanding for all the aspects of the existence. Inside of this activity, he is always more difficult to distinguish the time from work of the production time or free time.
We meet in time of global life, in which it is almost impossible to distinguish between the productive time and the time from leisure. (LAZZARATO; NEGRI, 2001, P. 30) In the after-modern society, the incorporeal work comes if becoming each time more hegemonic e, as Hardt and Negri they accent, can be carried through in common, having, therefore, to only assume the affective form of based social nets in the cooperation, contribution and relations between its members. Thus being, the constitution of a collective intelligence becomes possible that if bases basically on the processes of communication, production of differences and ways of life of the multitude. The social life depends on the common one. (HARDT; NEGRI, 2005, p.245) Making possible the expression of the diverse singularidades and giving to conditions for the work and the life in common, the multitude presents itself as the Internet and other organisms in net, refusing any type of sovereign figure and finding in the differences the points of convergence in the search for the social transformation. The Internet, by the way, appears as an important platform for one more effective democratic participation, guaranteeing the individual freedom.