I must say that on Friday, December 3, in full horrified drivers, personally didn’t seem at all wise decision to enable the army to assume command in the control towers at Spanish airports. He understood that such measures do not usually like investment, fleeing everything what looks like a suit of camouflage. And although comparisons are odious, it must be said that this type of military mobilizations are more characteristic of Latin American countries, where will get accustomed to the armed forces to resolve labor strife. However, achieved the return to normality and with her restitution in the right to freedom of movement of thousands of Spaniards, lawyer job that I am, I’ve come to join in the applause generalized in favour of the Minister of public works, Jose Blanco. Our country has seen historically he has played with our bread, since various collective transport, have called strikes in key dates for tourism.
Now is time for reflection, chance to assess the possibility of limiting the right to strike as being used abusively, or are contrary to the fundamental pillars of the national economy. To please you now has public opinion, who not has missed the hands to the head to see how the army assumed control of the airspace, or when not has been undeterred by listening to the expression State of alarm, uttered for the first time in 35 years of democracy. The public wants to now see the blood of the defeated Gladiators. It cries out for the dismissal and exile of uncontrolled controllers. The expropriation of their assets. Even their entry into prison. Not a few labor lawyers understand previously would clearly define the limits of a perverse law, the right to strike.
When safe investments are made that always looks for is the maximization of the profit or wealth of the shareholders of a company. Safe investments don’t exist because there is always a financial and operating risk when handling money. If this risk would not exist because everyone would be rich by investing in this type of investment. However the risk is something that can be decreased by not eliminating, and ways to reduce it is through analysis and projections for the future of the economic variables involved. In general the profitable investments give more profits the higher your risk, because employers are averse to risk and only invest their capital if the return is justified. Other safer investments such as deposits of debt with almost zero risk, leave very little gain.
Objectives which should always seek is to maximize the present value of the company. To achieve this goal it is necessary to maximize the following financial variables. Firstly, it is important to have a high profitability. This means economic ability to produce profits or benefits.On the other hand we have the liquidity, which is related to the capacity to fulfil the obligations undertaken by the company in time and form. As you can see these two objectives are opposing each other. To increased profitability, reduced liquidity, this is the case for example when purchases much raw material to produce and decreases the amount of cash to pay suppliers. A great liquidity situation is the opposite, when you have the cash but it does not reverse it, we then sacrifice profitability but we have liquidity. A good administrator of finance must make right decisions in three well differentiated areas. Profitable investments: the asset of the company, the size and its financing structure-related: related to the financing of the company and the growth of the same. Gives rise to the financial risk to assume loans and forced to pay dividends interest rates: decisions on distribution of dividends or reinvested in the company as a form of self-financing.